AI ALPHA LABS · INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Can frontier models be trusted with trade-ops work?

We run every case three times and publish accuracy and run-to-run consistency. Every number on this page is computed from the result files in our public repository; each chart links to its source folder.

Same model, different host

DeepSeek V4 Pro on the same 97 AAL-D-008 cases, pinned to each serving host: share of answers with the correct value.
Azure7.2%DeepInfra5.2%DigitalOcean88.7%Novita99.0%
Figure 1. Value accuracy by serving host, DeepSeek V4 Pro, AAL-D-008 v0.1, as of 2026-09-29.
Errored responses count as incorrect (Azure 3, DeepInfra 0, DigitalOcean 3, Novita 0). Reasoning on or off follows each host's default.
Source: eval_out_d008/pinned_host_deepseek.json · AAL-D-008 is v0.1

Accuracy isn't the whole story

AAL-D-007, v1.2 runs (SIMM/UMR initial margin disputes): value accuracy vs. how often a model's value answer changed across its own 3 runs.
0102030405060708090100Value answer changed between runs (%)Value acc. (%)1. claude-opus-5: 87.0% value accuracy, 3.7% flip12. gpt-5.6-sol: 85.8% value accuracy, 7.4% flip23. moonshotai/kimi-k3: 85.2% value accuracy, 9.3% flip34. meta/muse-spark-1.2: 83.3% value accuracy, 16.7% flip45. gemini-3.1-pro-preview: 82.5% value accuracy, 4.3% flip56. x-ai/grok-4.5: 79.4% value accuracy, 16.0% flip67. claude-sonnet-5: 76.5% value accuracy, 21.6% flip78. gpt-6-astra: 68.9% value accuracy, 3.1% flip89. deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: 67.7% value accuracy, 37.0% flip9
  1. 1claude-opus-5 (87.0%, 3.7%)
  2. 2gpt-5.6-sol (85.8%, 7.4%)
  3. 3moonshotai/kimi-k3 (85.2%, 9.3%)
  4. 4meta/muse-spark-1.2 (83.3%, 16.7%)
  5. 5gemini-3.1-pro-preview (82.5%, 4.3%)
  6. 6x-ai/grok-4.5 (79.4%, 16.0%)
  7. 7claude-sonnet-5 (76.5%, 21.6%)
  8. 8gpt-6-astra (68.9%, 3.1%)
  9. 9deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro (67.7%, 37.0%)
Each numbered dot is one model, numbered by value accuracy (highest first); the key gives (value accuracy, value flip). Where two markers would overlap, one is moved and a line points to its true position. All markers are one colour; colour carries no meaning.
Figure 2. Value accuracy vs. run-to-run value flip rate, AAL-D-007 v1.2 (v1.2 runs), as of 2026-10-12.
Shown for all 9 models in the published v1.2 flip-rate file. Each model's flip rate is counted over the same 162 disputed cases. Hover a point for its values.
Source: eval_out_d007_v12 (scorecard_d007_*.json, flip_rate_d007_v12.json), 250 cases × 3 runs. As of 2026-10-12 (last commit to this folder).

Leaderboard: AAL-D-008 Repo Trade Disputes (v0.1)

250 cases, three runs each. Click a column to sort. AAL-D-008 Repo Trade Disputes (v0.1): full results page →
ModelDetectionAttributionValue ↓False positive rateAttribution flip rate
claude-opus-5-5100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%
x-ai/grok-4.7100.0%100.0%98.2%0.0%0.0%
gpt-5.6-sol100.0%94.5%93.1%0.0%4.8%
Table 1. AAL-D-008 v0.1 leaderboard, as of 2026-09-29.
As of 2026-09-29 (last commit to this folder) · Source: eval_out_d008 (scorecard_d008_*.json)

AAL-D-007 value accuracy, all 9 models (v1.2 runs)

ModelValue accuracyValue flipErrored runsFile
claude-opus-587.0% (n=486)3.7% (6/162)0scorecard_d007_claude-opus-5.json
gpt-5.6-sol85.8% (n=486)7.4% (12/162)0scorecard_d007_gpt-5-6-sol.json
moonshotai/kimi-k385.2% (n=486)9.3% (15/162)0scorecard_d007_moonshotai_kimi-k3.json
meta/muse-spark-1.283.3% (n=486)16.7% (27/162)0scorecard_d007_meta_muse-spark-1-2.json
gemini-3.1-pro-preview82.5% (n=486)4.3% (7/162)0scorecard_d007_gemini-3-1-pro-preview.json
x-ai/grok-4.579.4% (n=486)16.0% (26/162)0scorecard_d007_x-ai_grok-4-5.json
claude-sonnet-576.5% (n=486)21.6% (35/162)0scorecard_d007_claude-sonnet-5.json
gpt-6-astra68.9% (n=486)3.1% (5/162)0scorecard_d007_gpt-6-astra.json
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro67.7% (n=486)37.0% (60/162)0scorecard_d007_deepseek_deepseek-v4-pro.json
Table 2. AAL-D-007 v1.2 (v1.2 runs) value accuracy and value flip rate by model, as of 2026-10-12.
Source: eval_out_d007_v12 (scorecard_d007_*.json, flip_rate_d007_v12.json)